"So, I graduated and moved away so I don't have easy access to the Oxford Guide to Classical Mythology in the Arts to know if this usage was in there already or not; but, I did find a couple of usages during some leisure reading that you were probably already aware of, but just in case you didn't know them, I thought I would send them to help you in your quest to take over the world by recording all usages of classical myth. :) [The secret is getting out!]
Both usages are from Henry David Thoreau's Walden. The first of which is as follows:
The twelve labors of Hercules were trifling in comparison with those which myneighbors have undertaken; for they were only twelve, and had anend; but I could never see that these men slew or captured anymonster or finished any labor. They have no friend Iolas to burn witha hot iron the root of the Hydra’s head, but as soon as one head iscrushed, two spring up... How many a poor immortal soul have I met wellnigh crushed and smothered under its load, creeping down the road oflife, pushing before it a barn seventy-five feet by forty, its Augeanstables never cleansed, and one hundred acres of land, tillage,mowing, pasture, and wood-lot! The portionless, who struggle withno such unnecessary inherited encumbrances, find it labor enough tosubdue and cultivate a few cubic feet of flesh. (Pages 7-8)
The
smoking gun is clear enough, as is his meaning. It is hard to miss the
call to live simply in Walden, and the fact that many people find
themselves in ceaseless labor throughout their lives in order to satisfy
their lavish and worldly desires, they are worse off than Hercules, who
at least eventually finished his labors. [Thoreau's] poor countrymen labor
endlessly, all their lives, and never have anything to show for it. No
trophies, no accolades, and no reason to remember them after they are
gone.
The second usage invokes the Minerva myth...
And when the farmer has got his house, he may not be the richerbut the poorer for it, and it be the house that has got him. As Iunderstand it, that was a valid objection urged by Momus against thehouse which Minerva made, that she “had not made it movable, bywhich means a bad neighborhood might be avoided;” and it may stillbe urged, for our houses are such unwieldy property that we are oftenimprisoned rather than housed in them; and the bad neighborhood tobe avoided is our own scurvy selves. I know one or two families, atleast, in this town, who, for nearly a generation, have been wishing tosell their houses in the outskirts and move into the village, but havenot been able to accomplish it, and only death will set them free. (Pages 27-28)
Again, it is unfortunate that I was unable to
grab a copy of the OGCMA to read up further on this mythical reference
in a zero-grade setting, as it was I was forced to consult Wikipedia.
It is telling that Thoreau would side with Momos, the
minor figure who was ultimately cast out for his criticism of those in
power. [See Hesiod Theog. 214, for the earliest mention of this personification of fault-finding.] Rather than siding with the major Gods as most narratives do,
deriding Momos for his unjust and jealous criticism, [Thoroeau] claims that it
was a valid objection. He would be no stranger to criticism for his
writings, especially his essay on Civil Disobedience, in which he
criticized government and its lack of morality, especially in matters of
taxation. Perhaps, (and this may be a stretch) he means to draw a
parallel between the foolish and vain Gods of antiquity and the unjust,
overreaching government.
Just some thoughts. I didn't know who else to share
them with that might get a kick of them, but I remembered you hoped that
your students would continue to alert you to narrative gains and uses
of classical myths."
No comments:
Post a Comment